From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Aranas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 3, 2012
3:11-cv-00080-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 3, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00080-LRH-VPC

08-03-2012

LAMONT MARCELLE WALKER, Plaintiff, v. ROMEO ARANAS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (#35) entered on June 20, 2012, recommending granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (#26) filed on February 29, 2012. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#35) filed on June 20, 2012, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#35) filed on June 20, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (#26) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Walker v. Aranas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 3, 2012
3:11-cv-00080-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Walker v. Aranas

Case Details

Full title:LAMONT MARCELLE WALKER, Plaintiff, v. ROMEO ARANAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 3, 2012

Citations

3:11-cv-00080-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Aug. 3, 2012)