From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vucetic v. NYU Langone Med. Ctr.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 18, 2019
173 A.D.3d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9632 Index 161936/14, 595374/15

06-18-2019

Ante VUCETIC, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. NYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant, NYU Hospitals Center, et al., Defendants-Appellants. [And a Third Party Action] NYU Hospitals Center, et al., Second Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Horizon Contracting, LLC, Second Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Gallo Vitucci Klar LLP, Woodbury (Ivan C. Torres of counsel), for NYU Hospital Center and Lend Lease (US) Construction LMB Inc., appellants. Milber Makris Plousadis & Seiden, LLP, Woodbury (Joseph V. Cambareri of counsel), for Horizon Contracting, LLC, appellant. Sacks and Sacks LLP, New York (Scott N. Singer of counsel), for respondents.


Gallo Vitucci Klar LLP, Woodbury (Ivan C. Torres of counsel), for NYU Hospital Center and Lend Lease (US) Construction LMB Inc., appellants.

Milber Makris Plousadis & Seiden, LLP, Woodbury (Joseph V. Cambareri of counsel), for Horizon Contracting, LLC, appellant.

Sacks and Sacks LLP, New York (Scott N. Singer of counsel), for respondents.

Sweeny, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Kapnick, Oing, Singh, JJ.

Summary judgment was properly granted in this action where plaintiff Ante Vucetic was injured when the A-frame ladder he was using to perform insulation work collapsed beneath him, causing him to fall to the ground (see e.g. Tuzzolino v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., 160 A.D.3d 568, 75 N.Y.S.3d 166 [1st Dept. 2018] ; Fletcher v. Brookfield Props., 145 A.D.3d 434, 41 N.Y.S.3d 700 [1st Dept. 2016] ). The record shows that the "safety devices provided to plaintiff did not properly protect him from an elevation-related hazard" ( Torres v. Monroe College, 12 A.D.3d 261, 262, 785 N.Y.S.2d 57 [1st Dept. 2004] ). Furthermore, at the time of his fall, plaintiff was following his foreman's instructions and thus, he was not the sole proximate cause of the accident (see Harris v. City of New York, 83 A.D.3d 104, 110–111, 923 N.Y.S.2d 2 [1st Dept. 2011] ; Kielar v. Metropolitan Museum of Art, 55 A.D.3d 456, 458, 866 N.Y.S.2d 629 [1st Dept. 2008] ).


Summaries of

Vucetic v. NYU Langone Med. Ctr.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 18, 2019
173 A.D.3d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Vucetic v. NYU Langone Med. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:Ante Vucetic, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. NYU Langone Medical…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 18, 2019

Citations

173 A.D.3d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 4868
100 N.Y.S.3d 521

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank v. Chrysostom

(U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Cope, 173 A.D.3d 527 [2d Dept. 2019].) The owner seeking to enforce a lost note is…

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Chrysostom

(SeeJP Morgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Assn. v. Escobar , 177 AD3d 721 [2d Dept. 2019].) Under UCC 3-804, the owner…