From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vinson v. Koubek

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 6, 2010
CASE NO. 5:09CV1826 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 6, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:09CV1826.

January 6, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court is the plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the remaining claims in their entirety. (Doc. No. 19.) Defendants have indicated that they do not oppose the dismissal. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED and all remaining claims are DISMISSED, with each party to bear its own costs.

Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), "an action may be dismissed at the plaintiff's request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper." Sometimes "terms" include some payment of defendant's costs by the plaintiff. However, defendants here have made no request for any terms of dismissal and, therefore, the Court grants none. Further, as provided by the terms of Rule 41 and since the defendants did not request otherwise, the dismissal is without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Vinson v. Koubek

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 6, 2010
CASE NO. 5:09CV1826 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Vinson v. Koubek

Case Details

Full title:HORACE L. VINSON, et al., PLAINTIFFS, v. MICHAEL KOUBEK, et al., DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 6, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 5:09CV1826 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 6, 2010)