From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vidal v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jan 24, 2020
No. 80188-COA (Nev. App. Jan. 24, 2020)

Opinion

No. 80188-COA

01-24-2020

FRANCISCO ENRIQUE VIDAL, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.


ORDER DENYING PETITION

In this original petition for a writ of mandamus, Francisco Enrique Vidal challenges the district court's denial of his "Amended Emergency Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Postconviction) Motion for Injunction/Extraordinary Relief." Vidal has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law available to him, because he can appeal from the denial of his petition. See NRS 34.575(1). Accordingly, without reaching the merits of any claims raised, we conclude this court's intervention by way of extraordinary writ is not warranted, see NRS 34.170, and we

It appears Vidal has appealed from the denial of his petition and his appeal is currently pending in Docket No. 80195.

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Because the filing fee for this matter has already been waived, we take no action on Vidal's motion to waive the filing fee. --------

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Tao /s/_________, J.
Bulla cc: Francisco Enrique Vidal

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Vidal v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jan 24, 2020
No. 80188-COA (Nev. App. Jan. 24, 2020)
Case details for

Vidal v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO ENRIQUE VIDAL, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 24, 2020

Citations

No. 80188-COA (Nev. App. Jan. 24, 2020)