Summary
In Vertetis, the defendant never applied his brakes or took any evasive action in colliding with the pedestrian as he claimed did not see the pedestrian prior to impact, whereas in DiCocco the defendant braked and swerved to the right but was unable to avoid striking the pedestrian.
Summary of this case from Archer v. BarnesOpinion
No. 114729.
2010-04-14
Lori VERTETIS, Individually and as proposed Administratrix of the Estate of Edwin M. Vertetis, Claimant, v. STATE of New York, Defendant.
Let interlocutory judgment be entered accordingly.