Opinion
No. 2006-T-0009.
May 12, 2006.
Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, Case No. 1993 JS 24726.
Appeal dismissed.
Irene K. Makridis, 183 West Market Street, #200, Warren, OH 44481 (For Plaintiff-Appellant).
Jeffrey V. Goodman, 252 Seneca Avenue, N.E., Warren, OH 44481 (For Defendant-Appellee).
MEMORANDUM OPINION
{¶ 1} On January 13, 2006, appellant, Brenda Veney, filed a notice of appeal from a December 13, 2005 judgment entry of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division. Thus, appellant's notice of appeal was filed thirty-one days after the judgment had been issued by the trial court. Appellant's notice of appeal was due on Thursday, January 12, 2006, which was not a holiday or a weekend.
{¶ 2} App.R. 4(A) states that:
{¶ 3} "A party shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within thirty days of the later of entry of the judgment or order appealed or, in a civil case, service of the notice of judgment and its entry if service is not made on the party within the three day rule period in Rule 58(B) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure."
{¶ 2} Loc.R. 3(D)(2) of the Eleventh District Court of Appeals provides:
We note that the numbering of this rule changed and was effective August 1, 2005.
{¶ 3} "In the filing of a Notice of Appeal in civil cases in which the trial court clerk has not complied with Ohio Civ.R. 58(B), and the Notice of Appeal is deemed to be filed out of rule, appellant shall attach an affidavit from the trial court clerk stating that service was not perfected pursuant to Ohio App.R. 4(A). The clerk shall then perfect service and furnish this Court with a copy of the appearance docket in which date of service has been noted. Lack of compliance shall result in the sua sponte dismissal of the appeal under Ohio App.R. 4(A)." (Emphasis sic.)
{¶ 4} Here, appellant has not complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in App.R. 4(A) nor has she alleged that there was a failure by the trial court clerk to comply with Civ. R. 58(B). The time requirement is judisdictional in nature and may not be enlarged by an appellate court. State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 58, 60; App.R. 14(B).
{¶ 5} Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed sua sponte pursuant to App. R. 4(A).
O'Neill, J., O'Toole, J., concur.