From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vang v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 20, 2012
No. CIV S-12-0159 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-12-0159 DAD P

03-20-2012

NOU VANG, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

By an order filed February 2, 2012, the court directed petitioner to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus and submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order and has not filed a petition or application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

Petitioner previously consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (See Doc. No. 4.)

_________________________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Vang v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 20, 2012
No. CIV S-12-0159 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Vang v. California

Case Details

Full title:NOU VANG, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 20, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-12-0159 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2012)