From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vancise v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Dec 18, 2020
308 So. 3d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D20-86

12-18-2020

Matthew C. VANCISE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm Matthew C. Vancise's judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to strike the costs assessed pursuant to section 318.18(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2019), as Vancise was not charged with a traffic infraction. See Sorenson v. State , 291 So. 3d 630, 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions.

COHEN, EISNAUGLE and SASSO, JJ., concur.

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).


Summaries of

Vancise v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Dec 18, 2020
308 So. 3d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Vancise v. State

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW C. VANCISE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Dec 18, 2020

Citations

308 So. 3d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)