From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Orden v. Madow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1923
207 App. Div. 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Opinion

October, 1923.


Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate order granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the direction that plaintiff submit to an X-ray photograph is not authorized by Civil Practice Act, section 306. Kelly, P.J., Rich and Manning, JJ., concur; Kelby and Young, JJ., dissent, being of opinion that the X-ray photograph is authorized as an incident of the physical examination.


Summaries of

Van Orden v. Madow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1923
207 App. Div. 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Case details for

Van Orden v. Madow

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE VAN ORDEN, Appellant, v. BECK MADOW, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1923

Citations

207 App. Div. 827 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Citing Cases

MEANY v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY

Order granting defendant's motion for an X-ray examination of the plaintiff reversed, with ten dollars costs…

Lacqua v. General Linen Supply Laundry Co., Inc.

The taking of an X-ray photograph is not authorized by the statute. ( Van Orden v. Madow, 207 App. Div. 827.)…