From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MEANY v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1926
215 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Opinion

January, 1926.


Order granting defendant's motion for an X-ray examination of the plaintiff reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. (See Van Orden v. Madow, 207 App. Div. 827.) Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox and Manning, JJ., concur; Young, J., votes to affirm the order. Order denying plaintiff's motion for a resettlement of the prior order, by striking out the recital in such order of the affidavit of a physician, sworn to May 11, 1925, also reversed, and the motion granted, without costs. No opinion. Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur. Both orders are reversed on the law and not in the exercise of discretion.


Summaries of

MEANY v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1926
215 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for

MEANY v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:MARY C. MEANY, Appellant, v. THE GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1926

Citations

215 App. Div. 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)