From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valli v. Grounds

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 5, 2012
2:11-cv-3413-GEB-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2012)

Opinion


KACEY VALLI, Petitioner, v. R. GROUNDS , Respondent. No. 2:11-cv-3413-GEB-DAD P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 5, 2012

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Petitioner's August 27, 2012 motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 21) is denied without prejudice to the renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings; and

         2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to remove Anthony Hedgpeth as the respondent and substitute R. Grounds, Warden of Salinas Valley State Prison, as the respondent in this action.


Summaries of

Valli v. Grounds

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 5, 2012
2:11-cv-3413-GEB-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Valli v. Grounds

Case Details

Full title:KACEY VALLI, Petitioner, v. R. GROUNDS[1], Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 5, 2012

Citations

2:11-cv-3413-GEB-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2012)