From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valadez v. First National Bank of Omaha

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 22, 2021
1:20-cv-00877-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00877-DAD-EPG

07-22-2021

LUCAS VALADEZ, Plaintiff, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, Defendant.


ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (ECF NO. 15)

On July 21, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party bearing its own costs and attorneys' fees. (ECF No. 15). In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys' fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

The joint stipulation cites Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) as the basis for dismissal, which provides as follows: “Except as provided in Rule 41(a)(1), an action may be dismissed at the plaintiffs request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper.” However, because the parties submitted a joint stipulation of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1), no order from this Court is necessary to dismiss this action. Accordingly, the Court concludes that Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) governs here and enters this order only for the purpose of noting the stipulation and directing the Clerk to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Valadez v. First National Bank of Omaha

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 22, 2021
1:20-cv-00877-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Valadez v. First National Bank of Omaha

Case Details

Full title:LUCAS VALADEZ, Plaintiff, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 22, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-00877-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2021)