From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uyeda v. Schermer

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Apr 4, 2019
SCWC-16-0000200 (Haw. Apr. 4, 2019)

Opinion

SCWC-16-0000200

04-04-2019

CAROLYN UYEDA and JAY UYEDA, Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. EVAN SCHERMER, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.


CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-16-0000200; CIVIL NO. 3SS 15-1-153K) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
()

Upon consideration of the Motion to Reconsider filed by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Evan Schermer on March 29, 2019, the declaration of counsel and memorandum attached thereto, and the record and files herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied. On remand, if the District Court of the Third Circuit makes findings of fact under Hawai'i Revised Statutes § 604-10.5, the district court may consider Petitioner's claims that he complied with the injunction issued January 19, 2016.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, April 4, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson


Summaries of

Uyeda v. Schermer

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Apr 4, 2019
SCWC-16-0000200 (Haw. Apr. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Uyeda v. Schermer

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN UYEDA and JAY UYEDA, Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. EVAN…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Apr 4, 2019

Citations

SCWC-16-0000200 (Haw. Apr. 4, 2019)

Citing Cases

Soderholm Sales & Leasing, Inc. v. BYD Motors Inc.

5. “The ‘clear and convincing evidence' standard is an intermediate standard of proof greater than a…

Soderholm Sales & Leasing, Inc. v. BYD Motors Inc.

5. “The ‘clear and convincing evidence' standard is an intermediate standard of proof greater than a…