From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Vogelsang

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 27, 2007
No. CR S-02-0151-MCE-CMK, CIV S-07-0247-MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2007)

Opinion

No. CR S-02-0151-MCE-CMK, CIV S-07-0247-MCE-CMK.

February 27, 2007


ORDER


Movant, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this motion to correct or set aside a criminal judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 194). Pending before the court is movant's motion, filed on February 7, 2007. Also pending before the court are movant's motions for appointment of counsel (Docs. 185 186), motion to correct the pre-sentence report (Doc. 188), and motion for leave to conduct discovery (Doc. 195). Movant's motion for release on bail (Doc. 189) will be addressed separately.

The court has examined the motion as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. It does not plainly appear from the motion, any attached exhibits, or the record of prior proceedings, that movant is not entitled to relief. See id. Respondent, therefore, will be directed to file a response to movant's motion. See id. If respondent answers the motion, such answer must comply with Rule 5 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. Specifically, an answer shall be accompanied by any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issue(s) presented in the petition. See id.

This matter has been referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Rule 8(b) of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings.

Movant has requested the appointment of counsel (Docs. 185 186). There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in § 2255 proceedings. See Irwin v. United States, 414 F.2d 606 (9th Cir. 1969). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this time.

Movant has also seeks correction of the pre-sentence report (Doc. 188). A review of the minutes from the September 6, 2005, sentencing hearing reflects, however, that the same motion was made by counsel and denied. In any event, the time to seek modification or correction of the pre-sentence report has long since passed. Therefore, the instant motion is also denied.

Finally, movant seeks leave of court to conduct discovery. Respondent will be required to respond to this motion at the same time a response to the § 2255 motion is filed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent is directed to file a response to movant's motion within 30 days from the date of service of this order;

2. Movant's traverse or reply (if respondent files an answer to the motion), if any, or opposition or statement of non-opposition (if respondent files a motion in response) shall be filed and served within 30 days of service of respondent's response;

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order, together with a copy of movant's motion, on the United States Attorney or his authorized representative;

4. Movant's motions for appointment of counsel are denied without prejudice;

5. Movant's motion to correct the pre-sentence report is denied; and

6. With the response to the § 2255 motion, respondent shall also file a response to movant's motion for leave of court to conduct discovery.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Vogelsang

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 27, 2007
No. CR S-02-0151-MCE-CMK, CIV S-07-0247-MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Vogelsang

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. SCOTT MICHAEL VOGELSANG, Movant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 27, 2007

Citations

No. CR S-02-0151-MCE-CMK, CIV S-07-0247-MCE-CMK (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2007)