From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Vargas-Reyes

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 18, 2003
71 F. App'x 766 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion


71 Fed.Appx. 766 (9th Cir. 2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Francisco VARGAS-REYES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01-10202. D.C. No. CR-00-01007-SMM. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. August 18, 2003

Submitted August 11, 2003.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Jose Francisco Vargas-Reyes appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Counsel for Vargas-Reyes has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Vargas-Reyes has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Vargas-Reyes

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 18, 2003
71 F. App'x 766 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

U.S. v. Vargas-Reyes

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Francisco…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 18, 2003

Citations

71 F. App'x 766 (9th Cir. 2003)