From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Ruelas

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 20, 2002
31 F. App'x 388 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion


31 Fed.Appx. 388 (9th Cir. 2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julian RUELAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 00-30402. D.C. No. CR-00-00048-RHW. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 20, 2002

Submitted February 11, 2002 .

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Robert H. Whaley, District Judge, Presiding.

Before B. FLETCHER, T.G. NELSON and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Julian Ruelas appeals his 46-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea conviction for distribution of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and possession of counterfeit obligations, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Ruelas contends that the district court's denial of his request for a departure based on his stipulation to deportation resulted from an erroneous belief that it lacked authority to depart. We disagree.

After reviewing the record in this case, we conclude that the district court's decision not to depart was an exercise of its discretionary authority. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review Ruelas' claim. See United States v. Timbana, 222 F.3d 688, 699 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1028, 121 S.Ct. 604, 148 L.Ed.2d 516 (2000).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Ruelas

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 20, 2002
31 F. App'x 388 (9th Cir. 2002)
Case details for

U.S. v. Ruelas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julian RUELAS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 20, 2002

Citations

31 F. App'x 388 (9th Cir. 2002)