From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Perry

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 18, 2003
72 F. App'x 687 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion


72 Fed.Appx. 687 (9th Cir. 2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth PERRY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 02-10284. D.C. No. CR-01-00296-WHA. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. August 18, 2003

Submitted August 11, 2003.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, William H. Alsup, District Judge, Presiding.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Kenneth Perry appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 6-month sentence imposed for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Perry's attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Perry has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our review of the Anders brief and our independent review of the record under

Page 688.

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Perry

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 18, 2003
72 F. App'x 687 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

U.S. v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth PERRY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 18, 2003

Citations

72 F. App'x 687 (9th Cir. 2003)