From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Paz-Aguirre

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 23, 2001
15 F. App'x 464 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion


15 Fed.Appx. 464 (9th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Porfirio PAZ-AGUIRRE, Defendant--Appellant. No. 01-10041. D.C. No. CR-00-00072-PMP. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 23, 2001

Submitted July 9, 2001 .

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding.

Before KOZINSKI, T.G. NELSON, and RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Porfirio Paz-Aguirre appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawful reentry of a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Paz-Aguirre contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court improperly added sixteen offense levels pursuant to U.S. S.G. § 2L1.2(B)(1)(A) based on an aggravated

Page 465.

felony that was neither pled in the indictment nor admitted at the change of plea. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 966, 121 S.Ct. 1503, 149 L.Ed.2d 388 (2001).

Because the district court has amended the judgment to remove the reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b), Paz-Aguirre's request for a remand is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Paz-Aguirre

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 23, 2001
15 F. App'x 464 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

U.S. v. Paz-Aguirre

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Porfirio PAZ-AGUIRRE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 23, 2001

Citations

15 F. App'x 464 (9th Cir. 2001)