Summary
holding that Almendarez-Torres remains good law after Apprendi and provides that prior convictions, whether or not admitted by the defendant on the record, are sentencing factors rather than elements of the crime
Summary of this case from Langley v. CareyOpinion
APRIL 2, 2001
No. 00-8789. MACIAS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 243 F.3d 551.
No. 00-8792. RIVERA-BECERA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 243 F.3d 551.
No. 00-8814. PACHECO-ZEPEDA v. UNITED STATES (Reported below: 234 F.3d 411); FRESNARES-TORRES v. UNITED STATES ( 235 F.3d 481); ALVARADO v. UNITED STATES (___ F.3d ___); AREVALOS-BARRIOS v UNITED STATES (___ F.3d ___); BECERRA-SANDOVAL v. UNITED STATES ( 248 F.3d 1173); BONILLA-GUZMAN v. UNITED STATES (___ F.3d ___); CURIEL-TORES v. UNITED STATES ( 238 F.3d 550); ENCISO-ACEVES v. UNITED STATES ( 248 F.3d 1173); ESPONDA-VENTURA v. UNITED STATES ( 246 F.3d 677); FUERTES-RAMOS v. UNITED STATES (___ F.3d ___) GARCIA-CONTRERAS v. UNITED STATES ( 248 F.3d 1173); GOMEZ-PINEDA v. UNITED STATES (___ F.3d ___); GOMEZ-VALDOVINOS v. UNITED STATES ( 246 F.3d 677); HERNANDEZ-GOMARA v. UNITED STATES (___ F.3d ___); HERRERA-HERRERA v. UNITED STATES (___ F.3d ___); HERRERA-RAMIREZ v. UNITED STATES ( 248 F.3d 1174); LOZANO-HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES ( 248 F.3d 1174); MAGANA-URBANES v. UNITED STATES ( 248 F.3d 1174); MARTINEZ-LOMELI v. UNITED STATES ( 248 F.3d 1174); MARTINEZ-LOMELI v. UNITED STATES ( 248 F.3d 1174); RAMIREZ-VARGAS v. UNITED STATES (___ F.3d ___); ROBLES-FRIAS v. UNITED STATES (___ F.3d ___); SALDANA-MENDOZA v. UNITED STATES ( 248 F.3d 1175); SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ v. UNITED STATES (___ F.3d ___); TORRES-CASTILLO v. UNITED STATES ( 248 F.3d 1175); AND TOVAR-TORRES v. UNITED STATES ( 248 F.3d 1175). C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-8818. ROSE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.3d 1361.
No. 00-886. MANYBEADS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Motion of Hopi Tribe for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 209 F.3d 1164.