From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Muhammad

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nov 24, 2009
353 F. App'x 75 (8th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 08-3073, 08-3075.

Submitted: November 19, 2009.

Filed: November 24, 2009.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.

Richard E. Rothrock, U.S. Attorney's Office, argued, Des Moines, IA, for Appellee.

Tony Muhammad, Sandstone, MN, pro se.

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Tony Muhammad appeals the district court's denial of relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 706 of the Sentencing Guidelines. Muhammad was indicted in two separate cases for conspiring to distribute cocaine base, but he entered a plea agreement covering both indictments and was sentenced to concurrent 228-month prison terms. The district court appointed counsel to represent Muhammad in bringing a section 3582(c)(2) motion, and denied a reduction. Muhammad's filings were docketed in both criminal cases, and were denied by the district court in both cases. His notices of appeal are docketed as two consolidated appeals. Because Muhammad was sentenced based on a binding plea agreement, the district court lacked authority to reduce his sentence under section 3582(c)(2). See United States v. Scurlark, 560 F.3d 839, 841-43 (8th Cir. 2009).

The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

Accordingly, the judgments are affirmed.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Muhammad

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nov 24, 2009
353 F. App'x 75 (8th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Muhammad

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Tony MUHAMMAD, Appellant. United…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Nov 24, 2009

Citations

353 F. App'x 75 (8th Cir. 2009)