From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Morrison

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Aug 4, 2006
04-CR-699 (DRH) (S-2) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2006)

Opinion

04-CR-699 (DRH) (S-2).

August 4, 2006

Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, New York, By: James M. Miskiewicz, A.U.S.A., Richard Thomas Lunger, Jr., A.U.S.A, For the Government.

Law Offices of Peter Smith Associates Huntington, New York, By: Peter Smith, Esq., Thomas P. Cleere, Esq., Ronkonkoma, New York, For Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


The Court is in receipt of Mr. Smith's letter brief of August 2, 2006. On page 12 of that letter the following caption appears: "MR. MORRISON RENEWS HIS DUE PROCESS CLAIM." The Court will construe that portion of the letter as a Motion for Reconsideration of this Court's Order of July 21, 2006 which denied defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment on due process grounds.

The government is directed to serve and file its response to defendant's Motion for Reconsideration on or before August 11, 2006. Should defendant elect to file a Reply, he shall do so by August 16, 2006.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Morrison

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Aug 4, 2006
04-CR-699 (DRH) (S-2) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Morrison

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. RODNEY ARNOLDO MORRISON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Aug 4, 2006

Citations

04-CR-699 (DRH) (S-2) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2006)

Citing Cases

United States v. Medina-Rivera

The triggering event for the appointment of learned counsel is the filing of the indictment. See In re…