From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Melo-Flores

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 6, 2007
230 F. App'x 433 (5th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-41742 Conference Calendar.

June 6, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender's Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, USDC No. 1:06-CR-643-ALL.

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.


Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos Melo-Flores (Melo) preserves for further review his contention that his sentence is unreasonable because this court's post- Booker rulings have effectively reinstated the mandatory Sentencing Guideline regime condemned in Booker. Melo concedes that his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511 (5th Cir. 2005), and its progeny, which have outlined this court's methodology for reviewing sentences for reasonableness. Melo also raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Melo-Flores

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 6, 2007
230 F. App'x 433 (5th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Melo-Flores

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos MELO-FLORES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 6, 2007

Citations

230 F. App'x 433 (5th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Melo-Flores v. United States

Carlos MELO–FLORES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.Case below, 230 Fed.Appx. 433. Petition for writ of…