From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Levels

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 1, 2003
70 F. App'x 978 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion


70 Fed.Appx. 978 (9th Cir. 2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. James LEVELS, Defendant--Appellant. No. 03-10082. D.C. No. CR-99-40253-SBA. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. August 1, 2003

Submitted July 21, 2003.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding.

Before BROWNING, LEAVY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

James Levels appeals his revocation of supervised release and his resulting six-month sentence. He originally pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Levels' counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issues for review on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Levels

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 1, 2003
70 F. App'x 978 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

U.S. v. Levels

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. James LEVELS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 1, 2003

Citations

70 F. App'x 978 (9th Cir. 2003)