From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. King

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 14, 2010
Criminal Action No. 09-cr-211 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 14, 2010)

Opinion

Criminal Action No. 09-cr-211.

April 14, 2010


ORDER


NOW, this 14th day of April, 2010, upon consideration of the following documents:

(1) Defendant Charles Everitt King's Motion for New Trial Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which motion together with a memorandum of law in support were filed September 15, 2009 (Document 38);
(2) Defendant Charles Everitt King's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which motion together with a memorandum of law in support were filed September 15, 2009 (Document 39);
(3) Government's Response to Defendant's Post-Trial Motions, which response was filed December 9, 2009 (Document 46); and
(4) Defendant Charles Everitt King's Brief in Support of Motion for New Trial and Judgment of Acquittal, which reply brief was filed December 19, 2009 (Document 47);

and for the reasons expressed in the accompanying Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Charles Everitt King's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Defendant Charles Everitt King's Motion for New Trial Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is denied.


Summaries of

U.S. v. King

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 14, 2010
Criminal Action No. 09-cr-211 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 14, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. King

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHARLES EVERITT KING, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 14, 2010

Citations

Criminal Action No. 09-cr-211 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 14, 2010)

Citing Cases

United States v. Wilson

Specifically, the court concluded the stipulation by the parties sufficient to satisfy the FDIC insured…

United States v. Ballard

"Although the court exercises its own judgment in a Rule 33 motion, including the right to weigh the evidence…