From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Johnson

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Nov 19, 2008
06-CR-6134L (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2008)

Opinion

06-CR-6134L.

November 19, 2008


DECISION AND ORDER


By decision filed November 12, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed defendant, Terrell Johnson's, conviction but remanded to this Court for a review of Johnson's sentence pursuant to the procedure outlined in United States v. Regalado, 518 F.3d 143 (2d Cir. 2008). The test, under Regalado, is whether this Court now believes that at the time of the original sentence it would have imposed a non-trivially different sentence under the advsiory Guidelines, especially in light of the United States Supreme Court decision in Kimbrough v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 558 (2007), which decision dealt with the disparity between crack and powder cocaine offenses.

I have reviewed the original presentence report, my sentencing notes, as well as the transcript of sentencing on September 17, 2008. Based on that review, I believe that I would have imposed a non-trivially different sentence had I had the benefit of the teaching of Kimbrough. Therefore, I vacate the Amended Judgment (Dkt. #57) and direct the Government to produce the defendant for re-sentencing.

It appears that there may be a clerical error in the Amended Judgment. That Judgment reflects that the Court sentenced Mr. Johnson to 27 months on Count 1. The actual transcript of the sentencing, though, reflects that I sentenced Johnson at the low end of the Guideline range which was 21 months.

CONCLUSION

The Amended Judgment entered December 6, 2007 is hereby vacated and the Government is directed to produce the defendant, Terrell Johnson, for re-sentencing. I schedule that sentencing proceeding for the 20th day of February, 2009 at 2:00 p.m. I appoint attorney Scott M. Green, Esq., under the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act to represent Johnson on this proceeding. Green, of course, represented Johnson at the trial and on appeal to the Second Circuit. Defendant will have until the 29th day of December, 2008 to file a sentencing memorandum on the issue of re-sentencing. The Government, if it wishes, may file a memorandum in response on or before January 23, 2009.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Johnson

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Nov 19, 2008
06-CR-6134L (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TERRELL JOHNSON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Nov 19, 2008

Citations

06-CR-6134L (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2008)