From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Hargrove

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 13, 2001
21 F. App'x 755 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion


21 Fed.Appx. 755 (9th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell L. HARGROVE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-10362. D.C. No. CR-95-00260-FMS. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. November 13, 2001

Submitted November 5, 2001 .

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Fern M. Smith, District Judge, Presiding.

Before KLEINFELD, McKEOWN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Darrell L. Hargrove appeals his guilty plea conviction for unlawful use of a communication facility, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b). Hargrove contends that the district court erred by sentencing him to a two-year term of supervised release. The maximum term of imprisonment for the charge to which Hargrove pled guilty is more than one year but less than five years; the offense therefore is a "Class E" felony. 18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)(5). The maximum term of supervised release after imprisonment for a Class E felony is one year. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)(3). The government concedes this point. We therefore vacate Hargrove's term of supervised release and order the district court to limit, on remand, the term of supervised release to not more than one year.

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Hargrove

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 13, 2001
21 F. App'x 755 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

U.S. v. Hargrove

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell L. HARGROVE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 13, 2001

Citations

21 F. App'x 755 (9th Cir. 2001)