From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Dilliehunt

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 6, 2008
286 F. App'x 520 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 06-10542.

Submitted July 22, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed August 6, 2008.

George L. Bevan, Jr., Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Oakland, CA, Robert David Rees, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Steven S. Lubliner, Esquire, Law Offices of Steven S. Lubliner, Petaluma, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, D. Lowell Jensen, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-00371-DLJ.

Before: B. FLETCHER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Jerry Dilliehunt appeals from the 38-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Dilliehunt contends that the district court erred by increasing his offense level by two levels for reckless endangerment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2. We conclude that the district court's application of the enhancement was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Reyes-Oseguera, 106 F.3d 1481, 1484 (9th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Dilliehunt

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 6, 2008
286 F. App'x 520 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Dilliehunt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry DILLIEHUNT, aka…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 6, 2008

Citations

286 F. App'x 520 (9th Cir. 2008)