From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Singh

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 23, 2021
2:21-mc-00125-JAM-AC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-mc-00125-JAM-AC Criminal 2:13-cr-00084-GEB

07-23-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SURJIT SINGH, Defendant and Judgment Debtor. EAST WEST BANK, and its Successors and Assignees Garnishee


[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FINAL ORDER OF GARNISHMENT (BANK, STOCKS OR BROKERAGE ACCOUNTS)

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court, having reviewed its files and the United States of America's Request for Findings and Recommendations for Final Order of Garnishment (Bank, Stocks, or Brokerage Accounts), and good cause appearing therefor, hereby recommends a final order of garnishment be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that:

1. The United States' Request for Findings and Recommendations for Final Order of Garnishment be GRANTED;

2. Garnishee East West Bank be directed to liquidate and pay to the Clerk of the Court the entire balance in the bank Account Number ***3560, within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the Final Order;

3. Payment shall be made in the form of a cashier's check, money order or company draft, made payable to the Clerk of the Court and delivered to the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, 501 I Street, Room 4-200, Sacramento, California 95814. The criminal docket number (2:13-cr-00084-GEB) shall be stated on the payment instrument.

4. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve matters through ancillary proceedings in the case, if necessary; and

5. This garnishment shall be terminated once the Garnishee makes its payment to the Clerk of the Court.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9 Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (9

Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

United States v. Singh

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 23, 2021
2:21-mc-00125-JAM-AC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SURJIT SINGH, Defendant and…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 23, 2021

Citations

2:21-mc-00125-JAM-AC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2021)