From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Kalsbeck

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jul 2, 1980
625 F.2d 123 (6th Cir. 1980)

Opinion

No. 79-5385.

Argued June 4, 1980.

Decided July 2, 1980.

R. Michael Murphy, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Lexington, Ky., for Kalsbeck.

Robert E. Sanders, Covington, Ky., for Kelly.

Patrick H. Molloy, U.S. Atty., James E. Arehart, Asst. U.S. Atty., Lexington, Ky., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge, ENGEL, Circuit Judge, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.


These two defendants entered pleas of guilty to three counts involving theft of money from a Wells Fargo truck and interstate transportation thereof in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659 and 2314. After having entered their pleas and found that they had been sentenced to consecutive sentences on the above counts and were faced each with 18 years in the federal penal system, due partly to a consecutive sentence on still another count which is not involved in this appeal, their appeal is directed at the proposition that they are being punished twice for the same offense.

It is conceded that they both robbed the Wells Fargo truck and drove the proceeds to New York State. In our opinion, it was permissible for the United States to charge both of these acts as separate offenses and penalize them separately. See Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932) and Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 97 S.Ct. 2221, 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977).

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Kalsbeck

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jul 2, 1980
625 F.2d 123 (6th Cir. 1980)
Case details for

United States v. Kalsbeck

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HOWARD TAFT KALSBECK AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Jul 2, 1980

Citations

625 F.2d 123 (6th Cir. 1980)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Ingrao

Congress surely did not intend such a result. We note also that we have upheld a conviction under this…

U.S. v. DeCorte

And, while the statute provides that interstate transportation of stolen property will "subject the offender…