From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hanks

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 19, 2018
No. 17-10160 (9th Cir. Mar. 19, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-10160

03-19-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JERRY DANNY HANKS, Defendant-Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:14-cr-01518-SRB MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding Before: LEAVY, M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Jerry Danny Hanks appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 8-month sentence and 28-month term of supervised release imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hanks's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Hanks the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Hanks

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 19, 2018
No. 17-10160 (9th Cir. Mar. 19, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Hanks

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JERRY DANNY HANKS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 19, 2018

Citations

No. 17-10160 (9th Cir. Mar. 19, 2018)