From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Fernandez

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 22, 2016
No. 15-35116 (9th Cir. Aug. 22, 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-35116

08-22-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUAN MANUEL FERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. Nos. 2:14-cv-00267-WFN 2:12-cr-00125-WFN MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Juan Manuel Fernandez appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Fernandez's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Fernandez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Fernandez

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 22, 2016
No. 15-35116 (9th Cir. Aug. 22, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Fernandez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUAN MANUEL FERNANDEZ…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 22, 2016

Citations

No. 15-35116 (9th Cir. Aug. 22, 2016)