From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States Fidelity Guar. Co. v. Ragusa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 8, 1993
195 A.D.2d 313 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

July 8, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (William J. Davis, J.).


Plaintiff, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Maryland, commenced this action against defendant, a Nassau County resident, for an alleged breach of an Indemnification and Pledge Agreement (hereinafter "the Agreement") and for payment under a promissory note. Plaintiff commenced this action in New York County based upon a consensual venue provision in the Agreement providing that an action may be brought "in any County in the State of New York". Defendant moved to change venue to Nassau County on the ground that he did not contractually submit to venue in New York County and that venue is proper in Nassau County.

The IAS Court erred in denying defendant's motion to change venue since defendant has raised a triable issue of fact whether his signature on the Agreement, which contains the consensual venue provision, was forged (Colby v. Ben Constr. Corp., 57 Misc.2d 850; cf., Kores Mfg. Corp. v. Standard Packaging Corp., 31 A.D.2d 622). Since the venue clause is unenforceable, the court should have granted defendant's motion to change venue to his county of residence (CPLR 503 [a]; 510 [1]).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Kassal and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

United States Fidelity Guar. Co. v. Ragusa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 8, 1993
195 A.D.2d 313 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

United States Fidelity Guar. Co. v. Ragusa

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Respondent, v. SEBASTIAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 313 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 40

Citing Cases

Freifeld v. Native Am. Energy Group, Inc.

Thus, a state forum selection clause will control, absent a strong showing that it should be set aside (Id).…

AFCO CREDIT CORP. v. KENARD CONSTR. CO., INC

The loan agreement expressly waives "any objection" to venue in New York, if so chosen by plaintiff. However,…