From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Mar 30, 2022
337 So. 3d 1263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D21-0716

03-30-2022

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY, LLC, d/b/a Millennium Open MRI, a/a/o Ali Leonardo, Appellee.

Michael J. Neimand, for appellant. Marks & Fleischer P.A., and Gary Marks (Ft. Lauderdale); David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines), for appellee.


Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.

Marks & Fleischer P.A., and Gary Marks (Ft. Lauderdale); David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines), for appellee.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Appellant United Automobile Insurance Company appeals from a final summary judgment entered in favor of Appellee Millennium Radiology, LLC. The trial court concluded that United Automobile was collaterally estopped from challenging the reasonableness of the cost of MRI procedures that Millennium performed. For the reasons set forth in United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC, 337 So. 3d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022), which addressed the same issue, we reverse.

We recognize that the trial court did not have the benefit of this recent decision.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Mar 30, 2022
337 So. 3d 1263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC

Case Details

Full title:UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. MILLENNIUM RADIOLOGY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Mar 30, 2022

Citations

337 So. 3d 1263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)