From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Twp. of W. Bloomfield v. Connolly

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 20, 2019
935 N.W.2d 890 (Mich. 2019)

Opinion

SC: 159557 COA: 345428

12-20-2019

TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew CONNOLLY, William Goodman, Robert Kovaly, Monica Miller and Patrice Woodworth-Crandall, Defendants-Appellants.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 20, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Markman, J. (concurring).

I agree that the questions presented should not be further reviewed by this Court, but as to defendants’ challenges to their conditions of probation, I would deny leave specifically on the ground of mootness, given that the lengthiest of their terms of probation have already elapsed. People v. Anderson , 284 Mich. App. 11, 17, 772 N.W.2d 792 (2009).


Summaries of

Twp. of W. Bloomfield v. Connolly

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 20, 2019
935 N.W.2d 890 (Mich. 2019)
Case details for

Twp. of W. Bloomfield v. Connolly

Case Details

Full title:TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MATTHEW CONNOLLY…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Dec 20, 2019

Citations

935 N.W.2d 890 (Mich. 2019)