From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner et al. v. Huffstetler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 11, 1912
126 P. 730 (Okla. 1912)

Opinion

No. 2221

Opinion Filed September 11, 1912.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Briefs. Where plaintiffs in error fail to serve and file their brief in accordance with rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), or within the extension of time thereafter granted by the court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from District Court, Creek County; W. L. Barnum, Judge.

Action between F. W. Turner and others and Mary Huffstetler. From the judgment Turner and others bring error. Dismissed.

Hughes Miller, for plaintiffs in error.

Henry McGraw and Thompson Smith, for defendant in error.


This case was filed in this court on December 29, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have failed to serve and file their brief in compliance with rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), or within the extension of time thereafter granted by the court; and upon the authority of Douglas v. Clayton Townsite Co., 29 Okla. 9, 115 P. 1016, Bank of Taft v. Thompson, 29 Okla. 683, 119 P. 124, Bruce v. Ketcham, 29 Okla. 685, 119 P. 124, and Lugrand v. Harris, 29 Okla. 690, 119 P. 127, this appeal must be dismissed for want of prosecution.

TURNER, C. J., and WILLIAMS, KANE, and DUNN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Turner et al. v. Huffstetler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 11, 1912
126 P. 730 (Okla. 1912)
Case details for

Turner et al. v. Huffstetler

Case Details

Full title:TURNER et al. v. HUFFSTETLER

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 11, 1912

Citations

126 P. 730 (Okla. 1912)
126 P. 730