From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank of Taft v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Nov 14, 1911
119 P. 124 (Okla. 1911)

Opinion

No. 1478

Opinion Filed November 14, 1911.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Briefs. Dismissed for failure to file briefs within the time limited by rule 7 of the Supreme Court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi).

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; John H. King, Judge.

Action between the Bank of Taft and William Thompson and Walter Dills. From the judgment, the Bank of Taft brings error. Dismissed.

Carl Pursel, for plaintiff in error.

Benj. Martin, Jr., for defendants in error.


This cause comes on to be heard upon motion of the defendants in error to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the plaintiff in error has failed to observe rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) in not filing briefs within the required time. An examination of the record shows that the plaintiff in error is in default in regard to filing briefs, although the time for doing so has expired.

The motion to dismiss must be sustained.

TURNER, C. J., and DUNN and HAYES, JJ., concur; WILLIAMS, J., absent.


Summaries of

Bank of Taft v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Nov 14, 1911
119 P. 124 (Okla. 1911)
Case details for

Bank of Taft v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:BANK OF TAFT v. THOMPSON et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 14, 1911

Citations

119 P. 124 (Okla. 1911)
119 P. 124

Citing Cases

Turner et al. v. Huffstetler

HAYES, J. This case was filed in this court on December 29, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have failed to serve…

Simmer v. Gray

An examination of the record shows that the plaintiffs in error are in default in failing to file briefs,…