From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tuckman v. Tuckman

Supreme Court of Connecticut
May 2, 2011
17 A.3d 1046 (Conn. 2011)

Opinion

SC 18786

Decided May 2, 2011


The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 127 Conn. App. 417 (AC 30913), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court, having determined that the trial court's child support order did not comply with the child support guidelines, properly invoke the mosaic rule to reverse all financial orders where it did not consider the defendant's challenges to the trial court's orders concerning alimony, property and attorney's fees?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court failed to apply the child support guidelines when the defendant sought unallocated alimony and support, and failed to file the required child support guidelines worksheet?"

HARPER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Daniel Jonah Krisch and Kenneth J. Bartschi, in support of the petition.

Charles W. Fleischmann, in opposition.


Summaries of

Tuckman v. Tuckman

Supreme Court of Connecticut
May 2, 2011
17 A.3d 1046 (Conn. 2011)
Case details for

Tuckman v. Tuckman

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG E. TUCKMAN v. KAREN R. TUCKMAN

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: May 2, 2011

Citations

17 A.3d 1046 (Conn. 2011)
17 A.3d 1046

Citing Cases

Tuckman v. Tuckman

We granted the plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issues: “1. Did the…