From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tribune Entertainment v. N.Y. State Division

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1994
210 A.D.2d 11 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 1, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.).


Dismissal of the complaint on the ground of administrative convenience prior to public hearing and formal fact finding was not arbitrary and capricious since the complainant will be proceeding in Federal court on identical claims (Executive Law § 297 [c]; Eastman Chem. Prods. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 162 A.D.2d 157).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Tribune Entertainment v. N.Y. State Division

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1994
210 A.D.2d 11 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Tribune Entertainment v. N.Y. State Division

Case Details

Full title:TRIBUNE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 11 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 559

Citing Cases

Universal Packaging Corp. v. New York State Division of Human Rights

However, as explained below, the two cases are not controlling precedent inasmuch as other case law as well…

Matter of Franklin v. St. Di. of Human Rights

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The determination of the respondent New York State Division…