Opinion
October 16, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Saladino, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The determination of the respondent New York State Division of Human Rights to dismiss the complaint of Chike D. Anamdi on the ground of administrative convenience was not purely arbitrary ( see, Executive Law § 297 [c]; Matter of Pan Am. World Airways v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 61 N.Y.2d 542; see also, Tribune Entertainment Corp. v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 210 A.D.2d 11; Mitsubishi Bank v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 176 A.D.2d 689; Matter of Arcata Graphics Co. v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 175 A.D.2d 663).
We have examined the appellants' remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Friedmann, JJ., concur.