From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tracy v. City of Redding

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 2, 2010
No. CIV S-10-1130-FCD-CMK (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1130-FCD-CMK.

December 2, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Originally filed in the Shasta County Superior Court, defendants removed the case to this court on May 6, 2010. A scheduling conference was held on November 18, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned in Redding, California. Gary Brickwood, Esq., appeared for defendants. Plaintiff failed to appear or file a scheduling conference statement.

By separate order the court sets forth a schedule for the prosecution of this case in the event it is not dismissed.

In light of plaintiff's failure to appear at the scheduling conference and her apparent failure to prosecute this case, plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. Failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of the action for the reasons outlined above. See id.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders.

DATED: December 1, 2010


Summaries of

Tracy v. City of Redding

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 2, 2010
No. CIV S-10-1130-FCD-CMK (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Tracy v. City of Redding

Case Details

Full title:MEGAN VOGEL TRACY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF REDDING, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 2, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1130-FCD-CMK (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2010)