From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tomaso v. Sestak

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Feb 2, 1944
321 Ill. App. 363 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)

Opinion

Gen. No. 42,341. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed February 2, 1944 Rehearing denied March 3, 1944

ON REHEARING.

AUTOMOBILES AND MOTOR VEHICLES, § 167.4when judgments for plaintiff in automobile collision case will be affirmed. On defendant's appeal from personal injuries and property damage judgments for plaintiff in automobile collision case, held that, as against defendant's contentions of lack of jurisdiction in municipal court which tried case, estoppel by verdict, and excessiveness of damages awarded for plaintiff's injuries, judgments would be affirmed.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. JOSEPH H. MCGARRY, Judge, presiding.

Judgments affirmed. Heard in the third division, first district, this court at the October term, 1942.

Rider Thuma and Chester D. Kern, for appellant;

Elliodor M. Libonati, for appellee;

Abraham Miller, of counsel;

Samuel Nicosia, amicus curiae.


Not to be published In full. Opinion filed February 2, 1944; rehearing denied March 3, 1944.


Summaries of

Tomaso v. Sestak

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Feb 2, 1944
321 Ill. App. 363 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)
Case details for

Tomaso v. Sestak

Case Details

Full title:Robert S. Tomaso, Appellee, v. Fred Sestak, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District

Date published: Feb 2, 1944

Citations

321 Ill. App. 363 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)
53 N.E.2d 134

Citing Cases

Ras v. Allan Anthony Electric Corp.

The pertinent statutory language, in form unaltered since the creation of the statute in the last century,…

McChesney v. Moore

We have collected in the margin some of the authorities apparently contra but some of which are…