From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toliver v. Comm'r of Dep't of Corr. Servs.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 6, 2012
101 A.D.3d 1198 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-12-6

In the Matter of Michel TOLIVER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES et al., Respondents.

Michel Toliver, Wallkill, petitioner pro se. *507Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank K. Walsh of counsel), for respondents.


Michel Toliver, Wallkill, petitioner pro se. *507Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank K. Walsh of counsel), for respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of refusing a direct order and interfering with an employee. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. As such, petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled and this proceeding is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Torres v. Prack, 98 A.D.3d 1204, 1204–1205, 950 N.Y.S.2d 921 [2012] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $30.

PETERS, P.J., ROSE, MALONE JR., McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Toliver v. Comm'r of Dep't of Corr. Servs.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 6, 2012
101 A.D.3d 1198 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Toliver v. Comm'r of Dep't of Corr. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michel TOLIVER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 6, 2012

Citations

101 A.D.3d 1198 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 8376
954 N.Y.S.2d 506

Citing Cases

McKethan v. Prack

The Attorney General has informed this Court that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the determination…