From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McKethan v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2013
111 A.D.3d 1046 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-11-14

In the Matter of William McKETHAN, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

William McKethan, Morovia, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


William McKethan, Morovia, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of possession of contraband and misuse of state property. The Attorney General has informed this Court that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been refunded. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Toliver v. Commissioner of Dept. of Corr. Servs., 101 A.D.3d 1198, 1198, 954 N.Y.S.2d 506 [2012];Matter of Jordan v. Fischer, 98 A.D.3d 788, 788, 948 N.Y.S.2d 923 [2012] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without cost, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.

PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN, STEIN and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McKethan v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2013
111 A.D.3d 1046 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

McKethan v. Prack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of William McKETHAN, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 14, 2013

Citations

111 A.D.3d 1046 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7537
974 N.Y.S.2d 809

Citing Cases

Warmus v. Kaplan

Although petitioner seeks to be restored to her prior status, she is not entitled to such relief (see Matter…

Gonzalez v. Prack

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…