From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tobin v. Davis

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 7, 2021
1:18-cv-01375-NE-SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2021)

Opinion

1:18-cv-01375-NE-SAB

09-07-2021

CHRISTOPHER ALLAN TOBIN, Petitioner, v. RONALD DAVIS, Warden of San Quentin State Prison, Respondent.[1]


DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER SCHEDULING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE

The record reflects that on August 27, 2021, Petitioner, through counsel, filed a motion for stay and abeyance pursuant to Rhines v. Webber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). (ECF No. 45.) The motion has not been set for hearing.

Accordingly, Respondent shall file his response to the instant motion by not later than thirty (30) days following the filed date of this order. Petitioner's reply shall be filed by not later than fifteen (15) days from the filed date of the response. Thereupon, the matter shall be deemed submitted and the parties will be notified by minute order if a hearing is necessary.

See Standing Order in Light of Ongoing Judicial Emergency in the Eastern District of California, and General Orders in the Eastern District of California regarding COVID-19 Emergency available at: http://www.caed.circ9.dcn/index.cfm/iCAED/coronavirus-covid-19guidance/

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tobin v. Davis

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 7, 2021
1:18-cv-01375-NE-SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Tobin v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER ALLAN TOBIN, Petitioner, v. RONALD DAVIS, Warden of San…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 7, 2021

Citations

1:18-cv-01375-NE-SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2021)