From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tinetti v. Wittke

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Apr 24, 1980
620 F.2d 160 (7th Cir. 1980)

Summary

holding unconstitutional strip searches of arrestees charged with minor traffic offenses without probable cause

Summary of this case from Brown v. Short

Opinion

No. 79-2442.

Argued April 11, 1980.

Decided April 24, 1980.

Richard H. Kjeldgaard, Racine, Wis., for defendants-appellants.

Terry W. Rose, Kenosha, Wis., Raymond M. Dall'osto, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

Before CASTLE, Senior Circuit Judge, SWYGERT and SPRECHER, Circuit Judges.


Plaintiff-appellee Jill Tinetti brought this suit challenging the constitutionality of the defendants-appellants' practice of strip-searching persons arrested for non-misdemeanor traffic offenses. The searches were conducted upon all such offenders who were detained overnight in the Racine County jail due to an unwillingness or inability to post bond before their initial appearance in court. The searches were conducted despite the absence of any probable cause to believe that the detainees were concealing contraband or weapons on their bodies. The district court ruled that the appellants' practices violated the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, and granted Tinetti both declaratory and injunctive relief. We affirm the judgment of the district court, which is published at 479 F. Supp. 486 (E.D.Wis. 1979), and adopt the district court's Memorandum and Order as the decision of this court.

Although the searches were discontinued in response to this lawsuit, the district court ruled that the situation was "capable of repetition yet evading review". 479 F. Supp. 486, 489 (E.D.Wis. 1979). this ruling was not challenged on appeal.

Accordingly, the decision of the district court is

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Tinetti v. Wittke

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Apr 24, 1980
620 F.2d 160 (7th Cir. 1980)

holding unconstitutional strip searches of arrestees charged with minor traffic offenses without probable cause

Summary of this case from Brown v. Short

affirming 479 F. Supp. 486 (E.D. Wis. 1979)

Summary of this case from Firkins v. McLaurin

describing "the visual inspection of the anal and genital areas" as "demeaning, dehumanizing, undignified, humiliating, terrifying, unpleasant, embarrassing, repulsive, signifying degradation and submission"

Summary of this case from Brown v. Polk Cnty.

In Tinetti v. Wittke, 620 F.2d 160 (7th Cir. 1980), we adopted the opinion of Judge Warren, 479 F. Supp. 486 (E.D.Wis. 1979), who quoted language from an oral decision, Sala v. County of Suffolk (E.D. N.Y. Nov. 28, 1978) (unpublished decision), describing strip searches involving the visual inspection of the anal and genital areas as "demeaning, dehumanizing, undignified, humiliating, terrifying, unpleasant, embarrassing, repulsive, signifying degradation and submission...." 479 F. Supp. at 491.

Summary of this case from Mary Beth G. v. City of Chicago

invalidating blanket policy of strip searching non-misdemeanor traffic violators unable to post cash bond

Summary of this case from Iskander v. Village of Forest Park

describing intentional visual inspections of pretrial detainees' anal and genital regions

Summary of this case from Batchelor v. Putnam County Sheriff Steve Fenwick

In Tinetti v. Wittke, 620 F.2d 160 (7th Cir. 1980), the Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court's holding, 479 F. Supp. 486 (E.D. Wis. 1979), that a blanket policy of strip searching people charged with a non-misdemeanor traffic violation "without probable cause to believe that she was concealing weapons or contraband on her body was a violation of the plaintiff's rights under the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution."

Summary of this case from Calvin v. Sheriff of Will County
Case details for

Tinetti v. Wittke

Case Details

Full title:JILL TINETTI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. LEE WITTKE, SHERIFF RACINE COUNTY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Date published: Apr 24, 1980

Citations

620 F.2d 160 (7th Cir. 1980)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Montgomery County, Md.

h, 441 U.S. 520, 560, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 1885, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979); Stewart v. Lubbock County, Texas, 767 F.2d…

Dufrin v. Spreen

The district judge directed a verdict in favor of Caroline Dufrin, after which the jury awarded her damages…