Summary
holding that an order denying a motion for appointment of counsel is not an appealable order under rule 9.140
Summary of this case from Girley v. StateOpinion
No. 4D02-558.
March 20, 2002.
Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Richard I. Wennet, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-4121 CFA02.
John Edward Thurston, Milton, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Appellant, who apparently has a rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief pending, has taken an appeal from an order denying his motion for appointment of counsel to represent him in post-conviction proceedings. This order is not appealable under rule 9.140. We therefore dismiss the appeal without prejudice to appellant raising the denial of his motion for appointment of counsel in an appeal from an order denying his rule 3.850 motion in the event that his motion is denied.
WARNER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.