From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 11, 2006
919 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 3D05-1783.

January 11, 2006.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Henry Leyte-Vidal, Judge.

Anthony Mitchell, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LEVY, SHEPHERD, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.


The Appellant, who also has filed a separate appeal from the denial of a rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief, appeals herein, from an order denying his motion for appointment of counsel to represent him in his post-conviction proceedings. As the trial court's order denying the appointment of appellate counsel is not appealable under rule 9.140, see Thurston v. State, 812 So.2d 516 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), we dismiss the instant appeal without prejudice. The defendant may raise the issue in his appeal from the denial of his rule 3.850 motion. See id.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 11, 2006
919 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Mitchell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony MITCHELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 11, 2006

Citations

919 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Morey v. State

This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant raising the denial of his motion in an appeal from a final…