From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thorpe v. New York State Department of Correctional Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 10, 2003
307 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

92536

Decided and Entered: July 10, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McNamara, J.), entered September 12, 2002 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent calculating the length of petitioner's term of imprisonment.

David Thorpe, Beacon, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Nancy A. Spiegel of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner is currently incarcerated as the result of several sentences, the most recent of which was imposed in August 1997 upon his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, a crime which he committed in 1992 while released on parole. Based upon the sum of petitioner's sentences (which include his conviction in 1983 of the crimes of robbery in the second degree and attempted robbery in the second degree, together with subsequent adjudications of parole delinquency), respondent calculated petitioner's maximum release date as May 30, 2013. In March 2002, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging respondent's computation of his maximum sentence. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, giving rise to this appeal.

Notwithstanding petitioner's contentions to the contrary, his sentence of 9 to 18 years, following his 1997 conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, was correctly ordered to be served consecutively to the undischarged portion of his previous sentences (see Penal Law § 70.25 [2-a]; see also Matter of Patterson v. Goord, 299 A.D.2d 769, 771). Petitioner's term of incarceration was correctly determined; hence, the judgment of Supreme Court will not be disturbed.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Thorpe v. New York State Department of Correctional Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 10, 2003
307 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Thorpe v. New York State Department of Correctional Services

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DAVID THORPE, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 10, 2003

Citations

307 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
761 N.Y.S.2d 880

Citing Cases

Peterson v. Tomaselli

The proper means for contesting the calculation of a release date is to file an Article 78 proceeding in New…

In the Matter of Leonard v. Dushantinski

In the matter before us, DOCS carried out its calculations using the methods in subdivisions (b) and (d) of…