From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thigpen v. Heisner

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Apr 19, 2024
No. CV-23-01359-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Apr. 19, 2024)

Opinion

CV-23-01359-PHX-ROS

04-19-2024

Antonio Thigpen, Petitioner, v. Unknown Heisner, Defendant.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Camille D. Bibles issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the Court deny Petitioner Antonio Thigpen's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Neither party filed objections. Therefore, the Court will adopt the R&R in full. A certificate of appealability is not required. Forde v. U.S. Parole Comm'n, 114 F.3d 878, 879 (9th Cir. 1997).

Petitioner was informed he was required to keep his address updated. (Doc. 3 at 2). Petitioner failed to do so. (Doc. 11). It is not clear whether Petitioner received a copy of the R&R.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the R&R (Doc. 10) is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the petition (Doc. 1) is denied and dismissed and the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant.


Summaries of

Thigpen v. Heisner

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Apr 19, 2024
No. CV-23-01359-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Apr. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Thigpen v. Heisner

Case Details

Full title:Antonio Thigpen, Petitioner, v. Unknown Heisner, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Apr 19, 2024

Citations

No. CV-23-01359-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Apr. 19, 2024)

Citing Cases

Torres v. Gutierrez

Thigpen v. Heisner, CV 23-01359-PHX-ROS (CDB), 2024 WL 1705256, at *2 (D. Ariz. Mar. 4, 2024), report and…

Mejia v. Hudson

Enacted into law in December 2018, the FSA addresses the reentry of incarcerated individuals into society.…