Opinion
July 7, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The propriety of the disclosure device fashioned by the court is not properly before this Court, since use of that disclosure device was directed in a prior order of the same court dated September 29, 1995, from which no appeal was taken ( see, Damen v. North Shore Univ. Hosp., 234 A.D.2d 255). In any event, the defendant's contentions are without merit.
Bracken, J. P., O'Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.